39
Intersectionality in Caryl Churchill’s Top Girls: Class and 
Gender Identity 
Flo Gunstone 
The following extracts are taken from my longer essay on intersectionality in Caryl 
Churchill’s acclaimed play Top Girls as seen through the lens of class and gender 
identity.  
Few plays of the 1980s have made an impact on the political theatre genre as 
much as Caryl Churchill’s Top Girls. First performed in 1982 at the Royal Court  
Theatre, the play revolves around the life of businesswoman Marlene and her  
interactions with other women, set against the political backdrop of a neoliberalist 
1980s England. Churchill states that, “socialism and feminism aren’t synonymous, 
but I do feel strongly about both and wouldn’t be interested in a form of one that 
didn’t include the other” (Churchill 1987: 3). It would be impossible to discuss the 
theme of gender identity without referencing class, as the themes are so closely 
interwoven into the narrative. Churchill achieves this intersectionality through the 
all-female cast and strong female protagonist whilst exploring class differences, 
allowing audiences to form deep emotional attachments to the play.  
When evaluating Churchill’s success in presenting the themes of gender identity 
and class in Top Girls, it is important to consider her background. The playwright 
was privately educated from the age of ten, where she studied at the Trafalgar 
School for Girls before moving to Oxford University to study English Literature. 
Many critics have argued that the fact Churchill did not grow up surrounded by  
poverty limits her ability to write fairly about working-class stories and  
experiences. This has been a decades-old debate in theatre, with Liz Tomlin  
stating that, “the cultural and political mainstream narratives of stigmatisation are 
most often authored by those who are not of the communities they misrepresent” 
(Tomin 2025: 35). She also discusses critic Katie Beswick’s views, stating that she 
“likewise cautions against the commodification of working-class voices which 
can be marketed as authentic accounts of an exoticized ‘reality’ which is far from 
the middle-class audience’s own” (Tomlin 2025: 38). Whilst these viewpoints are 
logical, their usefulness is limited when considering Churchill’s portrayal of the 
theme of class. Churchill’s intention was not to create a collection of historically 
accurate biographies of working-class women. Instead, she extracted the issues 
she witnessed in society during the early 1980s, such as the effects of Margaret 
Thatcher’s government, and used them to create a fictional narrative that explores 
the theme of class, focusing on creating female identities that she could resonate 
with.  
Whilst Churchill’s connection to the struggles of working-class people can be 

View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.